Columbia Regulation Faculty’s extra lecturer explains why the Trump marketing campaign’s authorized challenges are “unfounded”.
Columbia Law School assistant lecturer Caroline Polisi told CNBC on Wednesday that “most, if not all” of the Trump administration’s legal challenges in Georgia, Michigan and Pennsylvania are “unfounded” as ballots persist in key battlefield states are counted.
Polisi, a federal and white collar crime lawyer, stated that the catch the Trump administration uses in all of these cases is election fraud.
“I think the real big problem here is that President Donald Trump is increasingly realizing that his only attempt to hold on to the presidency is litigation and that litigation may lead to the Supreme Court,” she said.
The Trump campaign has filed lawsuits to halt the voting in Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Michigan. The campaign team claims their officials need better access to keep track of the counts. The Trump team is also calling for an immediate Wisconsin recount, citing “irregularities in several Wisconsin counties.” The rules state that a recount can be done but only after all votes have been counted and the margin is within 1%. NBC News has named Biden the obvious winner in Wisconsin.
Trump tweeted Thursday: “Our lawyers have asked for ‘meaningful access’, but what’s the use? The damage has already been done to the integrity of our system and to the presidential election itself.
“We know that electoral fraud is not a threat to American democracy,” said Polisi. “We know from empirical data that this just doesn’t happen on a large scale.”
Polisi added that voter suppression and voter intimidation pose a real threat to US democracy, “which President Trump currently approves”.
Correction: This article has been updated to reflect that Polisi is an associate professor in law at Columbia Law School.